How does this relate to Jim Leyland? Well, he has admitted he pushed extremely hard to bring Miller up and feels no regrets for potentially stunting the best pitching prospect we had in the Minors (he's lost rookie status and for most prospect lists, no rookie status = not a prospect). He said that he took full responsibility for this failure but does not feel sad that he did it. Going as far as to say:
Well it's a good thing you sent him down after his meltdown of a performance in Kansas City a couple days ago before you "did something stupid" like, stunt his growth, perhaps.
"At the time, I thought he gave us a better chance to win. He isn't quite ready for this. I'm not sad that I did it. Sometimes you find out a guy's ready, and sometimes you find out that he's not."We took our shot. We're not going to be bull-headed and do something stupid.''
I don't know what's worse, a manager that gets to push for kids to come up early and perhaps stunt the growth of a top pitching prospect or a General Manager that lets his manager talk him into calling up a top pitching prospect and, consequently, possibly stunt his growth.
I don't understand your argument. How did Leyland "stunt his growth"? Physically, he is either pitching 5 innings for Detroit or 6 innings for AAA. Mentally, give me a break...he knows where he can improve now (control).
ReplyDeleteI don't see why you are made at Leyland. It sounds to me like you are more angry that he didn't keep his "rookie" status for your fantasy baseball league. lol
Brandon
Fort Myers, FL.